Voting System Architecture

An N-Version Electronic Voting System

Date Published: 
01/01/2009
Author(s): 
Soyini D. Liburd

The ballot battles of the 2000 US Presidential Election clearly indicate that existing voting technologies and processes are not sufficient to guarantee that every eligible voter is granted their right to vote and implicitly to have that vote counted, as per the fifteenth, nineteenth, twenty fourth and twenty sixth amendments to the US constitution. Developing a voting system that is secure, correct, reliable and trustworthy is a significant challenge to current technology.

An N-Version Electronic Voting System

Working Paper No.: 
17
Date Published: 
01/01/2009
Author(s): 
Soyini D. Liburd, MIT

The ballot battles of the 2000 US Presidential Election clearly indicate that existing voting technologies and processes are not sufficient to guarantee that every eligible voter is granted their right to vote and implicitly to have that vote counted, as per the fifteenth, nineteenth, twenty fourth and twenty sixth amendments to the US constitution. Developing a voting system that is secure, correct, reliable and trustworthy is a significant challenge to current technology.

The SAVE System: Secure Architecture for Voting Electronically

Working Paper No.: 
12
Date Published: 
01/01/2009
Author(s): 
Ted Selker, MIT
Jonathan Goler, MIT

Existing technology is capable of yielding secure, reliable, and auditable voting systems. This system outlines an architecture based on redundancy at each stage of the ballot submission process that is resistant to external hacking and internal insertion of malicious code. The proposed architecture addresses all layers of the system beyond the point when a voter commits the ballot. These steps include the verification of eligibility to vote, authentication, and aggregation of the vote.

Syndicate content