EVMs

Towards Better Voting Technology Research: Building a Research-Industry Dialogue

Date Published: 
01/01/2009
Author(s): 
Voting Technology Project

On March 13, 2007, the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project convened a Voting Systems Vendor Workshop on the Caltech campus involving a small group of academics and representatives from the voting systems industry. As an outcome of this one-day event, we present the following report and recommendations. This event was supported by grants from The Carnegie Corporation of New York and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. We thank them for their support of our ongoing efforts.

American Confidence in Electronic Voting and Ballot Counting: A Pre-Election Update

Date Published: 
11/03/2008
Author(s): 
R. Michael Alvarez
Thad E. Hall
Morgan Llewellyn

This study examines the confidence that voters have that their ballot was counted accurately in 2004 and the attitudes of the American public toward electronic voting. As many states and localities move to new—and often electronic—voting systems, understanding public confidence and public attitudes is critical for policy makers. This study includes several key findings:

LEVI User Manual

Date Published: 
01/01/2009
Author(s): 
Shawn Sullivan

A user manual for LEVI voting systems.

Who does better with a big interface? Improving Voting Performance of Reading Disabled Voters

Date Published: 
01/01/2009
Author(s): 
Ted Selker
Jonathan A. Goler
Lorin F. Wilde

This study shows how ballot interfaces variably affect the voting performance of people with different abilities. An interface with all information viewable simultaneously might either help orient or overwhelm a voter, depending on his/her skill-set. Voters with diagnosed reading disabilities performed significantly better on full-faced voting machines than those who demonstrated a high likelihood of similar, but undiagnosed, disabilities. In contrast, the diagnosed group performed worse than others when using standard-sized Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) systems.

Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines

Working Paper No.: 
46
Date Published: 
01/01/2009
Author(s): 
Sharon Cohen

Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting machine security has been a significant topic of contention ever since Diebold voting machine code turned up on a public internet site in 2003 and computer scientists at Johns Hopkins University declared the machine “unsuitable for use in a general election.” Since then, many people from computer scientists to politicians have begun to insist that DREs be equipped with a paper trail. A paper trail provides a paper printout for the voter to approve at the end of each voting session.

Encrypted Receipts for Voter-Verified Elections Using Homomorphic Encryption

Working Paper No.: 
41
Date Published: 
01/01/2009
Author(s): 
Joy Forsythe

Voters are now demanding the ability to verify that their votes are cast and counted as intended. Most existing cryptographic election protocols do not treat the voter as a computationally-limited entity separate from the voting booth, and therefore do not ensure that the voting booth records the correct vote. David Chaum and Andrew Neff have proposed mixnet schemes that do provide this assurance, but little research has been done that combines voter verification with homomorphic encryption.

Syndicate content