Latest Research from the VTP

A new barrier to participation: Heterogeneous application of voter

Author(s): 
Thad E. Hall
Kyle Saunders
Lonna Rae Atkeson
Journal: 
Electoral Studies
pp: 
Link to Article: 
a b s t r a c t

A Data-Centered Look at the Election of 2008

Working Paper No.: 
88
Date Published: 
09/01/2009
Author(s): 
Charles Stewart III
MIT
My expertise is in trying to use data to identify where election problems lie in America, especially at a broad level --- such as comparing states with each other or comparing counties with each other. I know that the purpose of today’s conference is to think about LA County, but there are lessons to be learned from looking across the country. So, what I thought I would do today is look at the election of 2008 to ask what do the data tell us about the experience of voters nationwide on Election Day?

Voting Technology and Innovation

Working Paper No.: 
86
Date Published: 
08/01/2009
Author(s): 
Thad E. Hall
University of Utah
The 2008 election was different from the last two presidential elections in that there was a clear winner on Election Day and the winner was a Democrat, Barack Obama. Controversies over voting technology that raged in 2000 and 2004 were relatively dormant. Instead, the election controversies that did come up were mostly discussions of lines to vote. This lack of discussion does not mean that there were not important issues related to voting technology that took place in 2008, just that they were not things deemed important by the media.

Interstate Voter Registration Database Matching: The Oregon-Washington 2008 Pilot Project

Working Paper No.: 
84
Date Published: 
08/10/2009
Author(s): 
Jeff Jonas
Entity Analytics
William E. Winkler
Abstract Voter registration databases maintain lists of registered voters that are used to determine who is and is not eligible to vote in an election. As such, accurate voter registration databases form a cornerstone of the electoral process. In the United States, each state maintains its own voter registration database. It is not uncommon for a voter to become registered in two states, for example as a result of moving from one state to the other or of living in one state and working in one another.

Resolving Voter Registration Problems: Making Registration Easier, Less Costly and More Accurate

Working Paper No.: 
87
Date Published: 
08/01/2009
Author(s): 
Thad E. Hall
University of Utah
R. Michael Alvarez
Introduction The practice of voter registration has a long history in the United States. In 1800, Massachusetts was the first state to impose a voter registration requirement. By Reconstruction, voter registration was used in a handful of states, typically in urban areas, as a tool to prevent multiple voting. By early in the twentieth century, most states required voter registration.

Auditing the Election Ecosystem

Working Paper No.: 
85
Date Published: 
08/10/2009
Author(s): 
R. Michael Alvarez
Caltech
Lonna Rae Atkeson
Introduction

Detecting Voter Fraud in an Electronic Voting Context: An Analysis of the Unlimited Reelection Vote in Venezuela

Working Paper No.: 
83
Date Published: 
08/10/2009
Author(s): 
Michael Alvarez
Caltech
Peter Ordeshook
Abstract Between December 2007 and February 2009, Venezuelans participated twice in constitutional referenda where the elimination of presidential term limits was one of the most salient proposals. Assuming voter preferences

Racial Differences in Election Administration

Working Paper No.: 
82
Date Published: 
07/01/2009
Author(s): 
Charles Stewart III
MIT
Summary of talk • Election administration data • Turnout differences • Reasons for not registering and voting (Census Bureau data) • Voting administration and race (Pew/MIT Survey) – Lines – Voter identification

How Much is Enough? The "Ballot Order Effect" and the use of Social Science Research in Election Law Disputes

Working Paper No.: 
44
Date Published: 
01/01/2009
Author(s): 
R. Michael Alvarez
Betsy Sinclair
Richard L. Hasen
Previous empirical research and other related research from survey methodology holds that candidates listed first on an election ballot may gain some measure of advantage from this ballot placement. Using data from the 1998 general election in California, we test whether a candidate’s relative position on the ballot has any statistical effect on vote shares. We find little systematic evidence that candidate vote shares benefit from being listed first on the ballot.

Pages