Why Everything That Can Go Wrong Often Does: An Analysis of Election Administration Problems
Working Paper No.: 10Date Published: 2008-11-30
Author(s):
Thad E. Hall, The Century Foundation
R. Michael Alvarez, California Institute of Technology
Abstract:
Before the 2000 presidential election, few citizens in the United States paid much attention to
election administration. But scholars have noted that election administration has been a problem
for decades. Despite the attention paid to election administration in the research literature, most
public policy efforts in since 2000 have been focused on purchasing new voting equipment and
fixing problematic procedures, and not on resolving some of the underlying problems in the
process of conducting elections in America. Our paper applies the logic of principal-agent theory
to the problem of election administration, and analyzes problems in the conduct of elections from
this perspective. We examine various components of the dominant method of voting in the
United States—poll site voting—and use our principal-agent perspective to demonstrate that
serious problems in the polling place environment could be resolved by other means of serving
voters, especially vote-by-mail, early voting, and Internet voting.